American Traitors or Americas Gone Mad?

Obama/Biden full-court press on Snowden is a bad joke

The Real Traitors to America are in Washington and New York

Sun, 06/30/2013 - 10:00

by: 

 Dave Lindorff

It's hard to know whether to laugh or cry as the US goes all out to get its hands on National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden.

We've got the US leaning on Russia to push him out of his sanctuary in their Moscow airport. We've got Obama and the State Department warning countries around the globe not to accept him or allow him to transit their airspace. And now there's smilin' Joe Biden, lecturing Ecuador's President Rafael Correa (threatening would be a better word) about not granting asylum to Snowden, whom the Obama administration and the Republican and Democratic stooges in Congress are branding a "traitor."

Meanwhile, the real traitors who have done so much to destroy America are buying politicians of both parties, using their undue influence to gut any effort at real regulation, all the while earning fat bonuses in their corner offices at megabanks like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citi Group, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo. No need to extradite those guys in order to prosecute 'em. They're right here in the USA. All that's lacking is a will to bring charges for things like mortgage fraud, derivative fraud, collusion, lying under oath, etc. But Obama's attorney general, Eric Holder, a former corporate lawyer himself, has already declared that he will not prosecute Wall Street's banks for their frauds in bringing down the US economy.

Even Cyrus Vance Jr., the supposedly tough-as-nails, no-nonsense district attorney of Manhattan, whose jurisdiction encompasses the home offices of most of the biggest "too-big-to-fail" banks, won't indict any of them or any of their top executives. It's not that he won't indict a bank, but instead of going after Goldman or Citi or Chase, he has indicted -- ready for this? -- a little independently owned community-based Chinatown bank called Abacus Bank, which has total assets of less than $250 million. That's million. For comparison, the largest US bank, JP Morgan Chase, has total assets of $2.39 trillion dollars, which is almost 10,000 times as big. Worse yet, although Vance, in indicting the bank, claimed its fraud (a bank employee, fired and voluntarily reported to regulators by the bank, had been been falsely inflating loan applicants' incomes to help them take bigger loans), was "an example of what brought down the US economy," actually Abacus has a loan default rate of 0.5%, which is just one-tenth of the national average bank loan default rate of 5-6%.

Why hasn't Vance, at least, indicted some of the big banks, which many knowledgeable analysts and critics have said are little more than giant organized crime syndicates, in some cases such as B of A, Citibank and HSBC actually knowingly laundering vast amounts of drug cartel cash? His deputy says it's because there is no evidence of prosecutable crimes committed by them! Probably it's the same reason Washington politicians won't go after them: it would jeopardize all that banker campaign lucre -- and Vance surely has his eye on the New York governor's mansion in Albany.

And so, back to Snowden, whose only "crime" has been to expose the galloping fascism of the US government, which has, behind our backs, established a national domestic surveillance system so vast and Orwellian that the old East German Stasi or Soviet KGB couldn't even dream about having such a thing.

Who has done more damage to the US? (from left, CitiGroup's Jamie Dimon, NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, Goldman Sachs' Lloyd Blankfein)

• Read more

‘[DELETED]’ Plots to Kill Occupy Leaders ‘If deemed necessary’

FBI Knew of Plot to Execute Occupy Activists but Did Nothing

Thu, 06/27/2013 - 15:45

by: 

 Dave Lindorff

(This article originally ran in WhoWhatWhy.org)

Would you be shocked to learn that the FBI apparently knew that some organization, perhaps even a law enforcement agency or private security outfit, had contingency plans to assassinate peaceful protestors in Houston and perhaps several other American cities — and did nothing to intervene?

Would you be surprised to learn that this intelligence comes not from a shadowy whistle-blower but from the FBI itself – specifically, from a document obtained from Houston FBI office last December, as part of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by the Washington, DC-based Partnership for Civil Justice Fund?

To repeat: this comes from the FBI itself. The question, then, is: What did the FBI do about it?

The Plot

Remember the Occupy Movement? The peaceful crowds that camped out in the center of a number of cities in the fall of 2011, calling for some recognition by local, state and federal authorities that our democratic system was out of whack, controlled by corporate interests, and in need of immediate repair?

That movement swept the US beginning in mid-September 2011. When, in early October, the movement came to Texas, law enforcement officials and the state’s banking and oil industry executives freaked out  perhaps even more so than they did in some other cities. The push-back took the form of violent assaults by police on Occupy activists, federal and local surveillance of people seen as organizers, infiltration by police provocateurs—and, as crazy as it sounds, some kind of plot to assassinate the “leaders” of this non-violent and leaderless movement.

But don’t take our word for it. Here’s what the document obtained from the Houston FBI, said:

FBI knew of plot to murder Occupy Activists in Houston but took no action to stop it, documents show

• Read more